Study of Behavior of Seismic Evaluation of Multistoried Building with Floating Column
SK.SHAMA BANU, G.SHANI PRIYANKA, , ,
Affiliations (M.Tech) Structural Engineering, Dept. of Civil EngineeringAssociate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering Priyadarshini Institute of Technology & Management
- In present scenario buildings with floating column is a typical feature in the modern multi-storey
construction in urban India. Such features are highly undesirable in a building built in seismically active areas .This paper
aims to investigate the effect of a floating column under earthquake excitation for various soil conditions and as there is no
provision or magnification factor specified in I.S. Code, hence the determination of such factors for safe and economical
design of a building having floating column. Sometimes, to meet the requirements these type of aspects cannot be
avoided though these are not found to be of safe. Hence, an attempt is taken to study the behavior of the building during
the seismic activity. In this study, the seismic behavior of the RC multistory buildings with and without floating column is
considered. The analysis is carried out for the multi-storey buildings of G+3 situated at zone iv , Using ETABS Software.
Linear Dynamic Analysis is done for 2D multi storey frame with and without floating column to achieve the above aim i.e.
the responses (effect) and factors for safe and economical design of the structure under different earthquake excitation.
SK.SHAMA BANU,G.SHANI PRIYANKA."Study of Behavior of Seismic Evaluation of Multistoried Building with Floating Column". International Journal of Computer Engineering In Research Trends (IJCERT) ,ISSN:2349-7084 ,Vol.2, Issue 12,pp.983-988 , December- 2015, URL :https://ijcert.org/ems/ijcert_papers/V2I1231.pdf,
1. K. N. V. Prasada Rao, K. Seetharamulu, and S. Krishnamoorthy, “Frames with staggered panels: experimental study”, Journal of Structural Engineering, VOL 110, No. 5, Page no: 1134-1148, 1984.
2. Maison Bruce F. and Neuss Carl F., “Dynamic analysis of a forty four story building”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 111, No. 7, Page No:1559- 572,July, 1985.
3. Krishnamoorthy CS, Finite element analysis, TMH Publications, 1987.
4. Maison Bruce F. and Ventura Carlos E., “DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF THIRTEEN-STORY BUILDING”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 12, Page no:3783-3803,1991.
5. Hartley Gilbert and Abdel-Akher Ahmed, “Analysis of building frames” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 2, Page no:468-483, 1993.
6. Chopra, Anil k. (1995), “Dynamics of structures”, Prentice Hall.
7. Arlekar Jaswant N, Jain Sudhir K. and Murty C.V.R, (1997), “Seismic Response of RC Frame Buildings with Soft First Storeys”. Proceedings of the CBRI Golden Jubilee Conference on Natural Hazards in Urban Habitat, 1997, New Delhi.
8. Awkar J. C. and Lui E.M, “Seismic analysis and response of multi-storey semi rigid frames”, Journal of Engineering Structures, Volume 21, Issue 5, Page no: 425-442, 1997.
9. Kattan P I (2003), “MATLAB guide to Finite Element”, Springer, Berlin & New York.
10. Balsamoa A, Colombo A, Manfredi G, Negro P & Prota P (2005), ”Seismic behaviour of a full-scale RC frame repaired using CFRP laminates”. Engineering Structures 27 (2005) 769– 780.
11. Fall H.G (2006), “Direct Stiffness Method For 2D Frames-Theory of structure”.
12. Bardakis V.G., Dritsos S.E. (2007), “Evaluating assumptions for seismic assessment of existing buildings “.Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27 (2007) 223–233.
13. Daryl L. Logan (2007), “A First Course in the Finite Element Method”, Thomson, USA.
14. Brodericka B.M., Elghazouli A.Y. and Goggins J, “Earthquake testing and response analysis of concentrically-braced sub-frames”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research ,Volume 64, Issue 9, Page no: 997-1007,2008.
15. Agarwal Pankaj, Shrikhande Manish (2009), “Earthquake resistant design of structures”, PHI learning private limited, New Delhi.