Impact Factor:6.549
 Scopus Suggested Journal: UNDER REVIEW for TITLE INCLUSSION

International Journal
of Computer Engineering in Research Trends (IJCERT)

Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access and Multidisciplinary


Welcome to IJCERT

International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends. Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed,Open Access and Multidisciplinary

ISSN(Online):2349-7084                 Submit Paper    Check Paper Status    Conference Proposal

Back to Current Issues

Robust Model-Based Data Management

B.ASWINI, B.RANJITH, , ,
Affiliations
M.Tech Research Scholar, Priyadarshini Institute of Technology and Science for Women</br>HOD-CSE, Priyadarshini Institute of Technology and Science for Women
:NOT ASSIGNED


Abstract
Making new connections according to personal preferences is a crucial service in mobile social networking, where the initiating user can find matching users within physical proximity of him/her. In existing systems for such services, usually all the users directly publish their complete profiles for others to search. However, in many applications, the users’ personal profiles may contain sensitive information that they do not want to make public. In this paper, we propose Find U, the first privacy-preserving personal profile matching schemes for mobile social networks. In Find U, an initiating user can find from a group of users the one whose profile best matches with his/her; to limit the risk of privacy exposure, only necessary and minimal information about the private attributes of the participating users is exchanged. Matching user profiles using their physical proximity via mobile social networking is a critical thing. We propose Find U, the concept used to limit the privacy levels and also to find the best matching profiles. To realize the user privacy levels here we are using secure multiparty computation (SMC) techniques. We also propose protocols such as PSI, PCSI to prove their security proofs. We evaluate the efficiency of the protocols by adopting the total run time and energy consumption.


Citation
B.ASWINI,B.RANJITH."Robust Model-Based Data Management". International Journal of Computer Engineering In Research Trends (IJCERT) ,ISSN:2349-7084 ,Vol.1, Issue 06,pp.453-460, DECEMBER - 2014, URL :https://ijcert.org/ems/ijcert_papers/V1I616.pdf,


Keywords : Private profile matching, Shamir secret sharing algorithm, Secure multi-party computation, set inflation attack, Honest but curious model, Blind and permute model.

References
[1] The Description Logic Handbook: Theory,
Implementation, and Applications, F. Baader, D.
Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. PatelSchneider, eds. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003.
[2] Modular Ontologies: Concepts, Theories and
Techniques for Knowledge Modularization, H.
Stuckenschmidt, C. Parent, S. Spaccapietra, eds.
Springer, 2009.
[3] S. Ghilardi, C. Lutz, and F. Wolter, “Did I Damage
My Ontology? A Case for Conservative Extensions in
Description Logics,” Proc.10th Int’l Conf. Principles of
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
(KR), 2006.
[4] R. Kontchakov, L. Pulina, U. Sattler, T. Schneider, P.
Selmer, F.Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev, “Minimal
Module Extraction from DL-Lite Ontologies Using QBF
Solvers,” Proc. 21st Int’l Joint Conf.Artificial
Intelligence (IJCAI), 2009.
[5] Z. Wang, K. Wang, R.W. Topor, and J.Z. Pan,
“Forgetting concepts in DL-Lite,” Proc. Fifth European
Semantic Web Conf. Semantic Web:Research and
Applications (ESWC), 2008.
[6] B. Konev, D. Walther, and F. Wolter, “Forgetting
and Uniform Interpolation in Extensions of the
Description Logic EL,” Proc.22nd Int’l Workshop
Description Logics, 2009.
[7] B. Konev, C. Lutz, D. Walther, and F. Wolter,
“Semantic Modularity and Module Extraction in
Description Logics,” Proc.18th European Conf.
Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 2008.
[8] B. Konev, D. Walther, and F. Wolter, “Forgetting
and Uniform Interpolation in Large-Scale Description
Logic Terminologies,” Proc. 21st Int’l Joint Conf.
Artifical intelligence (IJCAI), 2009.
[9] B. Cuenca Grau, I. Horrocks, Y. Kazakov, and U.
Sattler, “Just the Right Amount: Extracting Modules
from Ontologies,” Proc. 16th Int’l Conf. World Wide
Web (WWW), 2007.
[10] K. Wang, Z. Wang, R.W. Topor, J.Z. Pan, and G.
Antoniou, “Concept and Role Forgetting in ALC
Ontologies,” Proc.Eighth
Int’l Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC), 2009.
[11] D. Calvanese, G.D. Giacomo, D. Lembo, M.
Lenzerini, and R.Rosati, “Tractable Reasoning andEfficient Query Answering in Description Logics: The
DL-Lite Family,” J. Automated Reasoning,vol. 39, no. 3,
pp. 385-429, 2007.
[12] O. Palombi, G. Bousquet, D. Jospin, S. Hassan, L.
Reve´ret, and F.Faure, “My Corporis Fabrica: A Unified
Ontological, Geometrical and Mechanical View of
Human Anatomy,” Proc. Second Workshop
3D Physiological Human (3DPH), 2009.
[13] S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu, Foundations of
Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
[14] M.Y. Vardi, “The Complexity of Relational Query
Languages,” Proc. 14th Ann. ACM Symp. Theory of
Computing (STOC), 1982.
[15] A. Cali, G. Gottlob, and T. Lukasiewicz, “Datalog+-
: A UnifiedApproach to Ontologies and Integrity
Constraints,” Proc. Int’l Conf. Database Theory (ICDT),
2009.
[16] R. Cattell, “Scalable Sql and Nosql Data Stores,”
SIGMOD Record,vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 12-27, 2010.
[17] B. Cuenca Grau, I. Horrocks, Y. Kazakov, and U.
Sattler,“Extracting Modules from Ontologies: A LogicBased Approach,” Proc. Third Int’l Workshop OWL
Experiences and Directions(OWLED), 2007
[18] B. Cuenca Grau, I. Horrocks, Y. Kazakov, and U.
Sattler, “Modular
Reuse of Ontologies: Theory and Practice,” J. Artificial
Intelligence Research, vol. 31, pp. 273-318, 2008. 


DOI Link : NOT ASSIGNED

Download :
  V1I616.pdf


Refbacks : Currently there are no Refbacks

Announcements


Authors are not required to pay any article-processing charges (APC) for their article to be published open access in Journal IJCERT. No charge is involved in any stage of the publication process, from administrating peer review to copy editing and hosting the final article on dedicated servers. This is free for all authors. 

News & Events


Latest issue :Volume 10 Issue 1 Articles In press

A plagiarism check will be implemented for all the articles using world-renowned software. Turnitin.


Digital Object Identifier will be assigned for all the articles being published in the Journal from September 2016 issue, i.e. Volume 3, Issue 9, 2016.


IJCERT is a member of the prestigious.Each of the IJCERT articles has its unique DOI reference.
DOI Prefix : 10.22362/ijcert


IJCERT is member of The Publishers International Linking Association, Inc. (“PILA”)


Emerging Sources Citation Index (in process)


IJCERT title is under evaluation by Scopus.


Key Dates


☞   INVITING SUBMISSIONS FOR THE NEXT ISSUE :
☞   LAST DATE OF SUBMISSION : 31st March 2023
☞  SUBMISSION TO FIRST DECISION :
In 7 Days
☞  FINAL DECISION :
IN 3 WEEKS FROM THE DAY OF SUBMISSION

Important Announcements


All the authors, conference coordinators, conveners, and guest editors kindly check their articles' originality before submitting them to IJCERT. If any material is found to be duplicate submission or sent to other journals when the content is in the process with IJCERT, fabricated data, cut and paste (plagiarized), at any stage of processing of material, IJCERT is bound to take the following actions.
1. Rejection of the article.
2. The author will be blocked for future communication with IJCERT if duplicate articles are submitted.
3. A letter regarding this will be posted to the Principal/Director of the Institution where the study was conducted.
4. A List of blacklisted authors will be shared among the Chief Editors of other prestigious Journals
We have been screening articles for plagiarism with a world-renowned tool: Turnitin However, it is only rejected if found plagiarized. This more stern action is being taken because of the illegal behavior of a handful of authors who have been involved in ethical misconduct. The Screening and making a decision on such articles costs colossal time and resources for the journal. It directly delays the process of genuine materials.

Citation Index


Citations Indices All
Citations 1026
h-index 14
i10-index 20
Source: Google Scholar

Acceptance Rate (By Year)


Acceptance Rate (By Year)
Year Rate
2021 10.8%
2020 13.6%
2019 15.9%
2018 14.5%
2017 16.6%
2016 15.8%
2015 18.2%
2014 20.6%

Important Links



Conference Proposal




DOI:10.22362/ijcert