Workplace Sex Bias and Employees Opinion: A Study about India Perspective
Deepa Sharma, Dr. C. Venkateswaran, , ,
Affiliations 1 & 2: Dept. Management, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, India
Background/Objectives: In this paper, we examination include relatives from a distributed and unpublished investigation from around the globe to survey associates of apparent work environment sexual orientation segregation that have critical ramifications for representatives.
Methods/Statistical analysis: In this paper Quota sampling technique to be used. In this paper, three variables should be used to meet the objectives. These are controlled variables, dependent variables and Independent variables define in this paper. Sample size should be taken 120. Questionnaires will be divided into three segments mentally stress, family conflict and job satisfaction for estimation of dependent variables to be used appropriate statistical tools.
Findings: Our finding of this paper mentally stresses factors remembered to study about include mental indications and judgements of psychological conditions, sickness, what’s more, aliments estimated utilizing different clinical lists and wellbeing markers. We characterize the physical wellbeing as one’s capacity to genuinely work and perform workday today exercises without limitations.
Improvements/Applications: Seen sexual orientations separations is related to sparse representatives occupations perspectives, physical wellbeing results and practices
Deepa Sharma, Dr. C. Venkateswaran."Workplace Sex Bias and Employees Opinion: A Study about India Perspective". International Journal of Computer Engineering In Research Trends (IJCERT), ISSN:2349-7084, Vol.7, Issue 06,pp.13-18, June - 2020, URL:http://ijcert.org/ems/ijcert_papers/V7I602.pdf,
Keywords : Gender inequality, Woman, Mentally health of women on workplace, working environment
 Heilman E. Madeline, 2012, Gender stereotypes and workplace bias, www.sciencedirect.com, Research in Organizational Behavior 32 (2012) 113–135.
 Buchanan, N. T. 2002. Examining the impact of racial harassment on sexually harassed African American women, Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from Proudest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3070268).
 Lake, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd Ed.). New York, NY/England: McGraw Hill Book Company.
 Fudge, K., Beignet, M., Haines, E., & Daub, K. (2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 737–754.
 Gauche, D (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 109–128.
 Erich, C. G., & Crawford, M. S. (1998). Sex stereotyping in the executive suite: ‘‘Much ado about something’’. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 127–138.
 Matschiner, M., & Mermen, S. K. (1999). Hyper femininity and influence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 342–631.
 N. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1995). Effects of rater accountability on the accuracy and the favorability of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 524–527.
 Anna, A. L. (2003). Effects of accountability on rating behavior and rater accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2493–2514.
 Reusing, C. A., Peen, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men, Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11, 140–151.
We have kept IJCERT is a free peer-reviewed scientific journal to endorse conservation. We have not put up a paywall to readers, and we do not charge for publishing. But running a monthly journal costs is a lot. While we do have some associates, we still need support to keep the journal flourishing. If our readers help fund it, our future will be more secure.