An Integrated MCDM Approach for Cloud Service Selection Based On TOPSIS and BWM
Mr. Muthyala Lokesh Reddy, Mr. Harshith Makkapati, Dr. K. Venkatesh Sharma, ,
Affiliations Department of CSE, CVR College of Engineering, Vastunagar, Mangalpally, Ibrahimpatnam, T.S., India – 501510.
Because of the rapid advancement of cloud computing services and the proliferation of CSPs, many businesses
have required assistance in selecting a cloud service provider. When comparing the services provided by different CSPs,
many independent criteria should be considered. It represents multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). Given the vast diversity
of these services, choosing the best cloud service provider (CSP) becomes a major challenge. Due to this, we have to
precisely evaluate the services of several CSPs. The selection of the best CSP is thus a complex multi-criteria decision
(MCDM) that needs to be adjusted efficiently. In this paper, we propose a feasible, efficient, and consistent MCDM approach
based on relative preferences for criteria and alternatives. The proposed method includes Techniques for Order of Preference
by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and the Best or Worst Method (BWM).
Mr. Muthyala Lokesh Reddy,Mr. Harshith Makkapati,Dr. K. Venkatesh Sharma."An Integrated MCDM Approach for Cloud Service Selection Based On TOPSIS and BWM". International Journal of Computer Engineering In Research Trends (IJCERT) ,ISSN:2349-7084 ,Vol.9, Issue 12,pp.238-242, December- 2022, URL :https://ijcert.org/ems/ijcert_papers/V9I1201.pdf,
Keywords : Cloud Computing, cloud service provider, Techniques for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution, Best or Worst Method
 B. Varghese and R. Buyya, „„Next generation cloud
computing: New trends and research directions,?? Future
Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 79, pp. 849–861, Feb. 2018.
 E. Youssef, „„Exploring cloud computing services and
applications,?? J. Emerg. Trends Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 3,
no. 6, pp. 838–847, Jul. 2012.
 Almishal and E. A. Youssef, „„Cloud service providers:
A comparative study,?? Int. J. Comput. Appl. Inf. Technol.,
vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 46–52, May 2014.
 R. R. Kumar, S. Mishra and C. Kumar, “A novel
framework for cloud service evaluation and selection using
hybrid MCDM methods,” Arabian Journal for Science and
Engineering, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 7015–7030, 2018.
 S. K. Garg, S. Versteeg and R. Buyya, “A framework
for ranking of cloud computing services,” Future
Generation Computer Systems, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1012–
 A. Tripathi, I. Pathak and D. P. Vidyarthi, “Integration
of analytic network process with service measurement
index framework for cloud service provider
selection,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and
Experience, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1–16, 2017.
 J. S. Dyer, “MAUT-multiattribute utility theory,”
in International Series in Operations Research and
Management Science. Vol. 78. New York, NY, USA:
Springer, pp. 265–292, 2005.
 K. Govindan and M. B. Jepsen, “ELECTRE: A
comprehensive literature review on methodologies and
applications,” European Journal of Operational Research,
vol. 250, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2016.
 A. Afshari, M. Mojahed and R. Yusuff, “Simple
additive weighting approach to personnel selection
problem,” International Journal of Innovation,
Management and Technology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 511–515,
 G. Baranwal and D. P. Vidyarthi, “A cloud service
selection model using improved ranked voting method,
Concurrency and Computation,” Practice and Experience,
vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 3540–3567, 2016.
 N. Upadhyay, „„Managing cloud service evaluation
and selection,?? Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 122, pp. 1061–
 S. K. Garg, S. Versteeg, and R. Buyya, „„A framework
for ranking of cloud computing services,?? Future Gener.
Comput. Syst., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1012–1023,Jun. 2013.
 S. K. Garg, S. Versteeg, and R. Buyya, „„SMICloud:
A framework for comparing and ranking cloud services,??
in Proc. 4th IEEE Int. Conf. Utility Cloud Comput., Dec.
2011, pp. 210–218.
 F. Nawaz, M. R. Asadabadi, N. K. Janjua, O. K.
Hussain, E. Chang, and M. Saberi, „„An MCDM method
for cloud service selection using a Markov chain and the
best-worst method,?? Knowl.-Based Syst., vol. 159, pp.
120–131, Nov. 2018.
 Z. Rehman, F. K. Hussain, and O. K. Hussain,
„„Towards multi-criteria cloud service selection,?? in Proc.
5th Int. Conf. Innov. Mobile Internet Services Ubiquitous
Comput., Jun. 2011, pp. 44–48.
 A. M. Mostafa, "An integrated framework for cloud
service selection based on bom and topsis," Computers,
Materials & Continua, vol. 72, no.2, pp. 4125–4142, 2022.
 Youssef, Ahmed E.. “An Integrated MCDM
Approach for Cloud Service Selection Based on TOPSIS
and BWM.” IEEE Access 8 (2020): 71851-71865.
 Tomar, Abhinav & Kumar, Rakesh & Gupta,
Indrajeet. (2022). Decision making for cloud service
selection: a novel and hybrid MCDM approach. Cluster
Computing. 1-19. 10.1007/s10586-022-03793-y.
Authors are not required to pay any article-processing charges (APC) for their article to be published open access in Journal IJCERT. No charge is involved in any stage of the publication process, from administrating peer review to copy editing and hosting the final article on dedicated servers. This is free for all authors.
News & Events
Latest issue :Volume 10 Issue 1 Articles In press
☞ INVITING SUBMISSIONS FOR THE NEXT ISSUE :
☞ LAST DATE OF SUBMISSION : 31st March 2023
☞ SUBMISSION TO FIRST DECISION : In 7 Days
☞ FINAL DECISION : IN 3 WEEKS FROM THE DAY OF SUBMISSION
All the authors, conference coordinators, conveners, and guest editors kindly check their articles' originality before submitting them to IJCERT. If any material is found to be duplicate submission or sent to other journals when the content is in the process with IJCERT, fabricated data, cut and paste (plagiarized), at any stage of processing of material, IJCERT is bound to take the following actions.
1. Rejection of the article.
2. The author will be blocked for future communication with IJCERT if duplicate articles are submitted.
3. A letter regarding this will be posted to the Principal/Director of the Institution where the study was conducted.
4. A List of blacklisted authors will be shared among the Chief Editors of other prestigious Journals
We have been screening articles for plagiarism with a world-renowned tool: Turnitin However, it is only rejected if found plagiarized. This more stern action is being taken because of the illegal behavior of a handful of authors who have been involved in ethical misconduct. The Screening and making a decision on such articles costs colossal time and resources for the journal. It directly delays the process of genuine materials.